Ebner, M. Learning and Teaching with Mobile Devices

  • Published on
    09-Jan-2017

  • View
    222

  • Download
    9

Transcript

10th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MOBILE LEARNING 2014 iiiiiPROCEEDINGS OF THE 10th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ONMOBILE LEARNING 2014MADRID, SPAIN 28 FEBRUARY 2 MARCH, 2014 Organised byIADISInternational Association for Development of the Information Society ivCopyright 2014 IADIS Press All rights reserved This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Permission for use must always be obtained from IADIS Press. Please contact secretariat@iadis.org Edited by Inmaculada Arnedillo Snchez and Pedro Isaas Associate Editor: Lus Rodrigues ISBN: 978-989-8704-02-3 v TABLE OF CONTENTSFOREWORD xiPROGRAM COMMITTEE xiiiKEYNOTE LECTURE xviiPANEL xviiiFULL PAPERS SUPPORTING TEACHERS TO DESIGN AND USE MOBILE COLLABORATIVE LEARNING GAMES Iza Marfisi-Schottman and Sbastien George3EBOOKS AS PDF FILES, IN EPUB FORMAT OR AS INTERACTIVE IBOOKS? DIGITAL BOOKS IN PHYSICS LESSONS OF SECONDARY EDUCATION Manfred Lohr11MOBILE LEARNING AND EARLY AGE MATHEMATICS Shir Peled and Shimon Schocken19M-LEARNING ON PATH TO INTEGRATION WITH ORGANISATION SYSTEMS Shilpa Srivastava and Ved Prakash Gulati26IMPROVING HISTORY LEARNING THROUGH CULTURAL HERITAGE, LOCAL HISTORY AND TECHNOLOGY Graa Magro, Joaquim Ramos de Carvalho and Maria Jos Marcelino34INTRIGUE AT THE MUSEUM: FACILITATING ENGAGEMENT AND LEARNING THROUGH A LOCATION-BASED MOBILE GAME Jetmir Xhembulla, Irene Rubino, Claudia Barberis and Giovanni Malnati41MOBILE-BASED CHATTING FOR MEANING NEGOTIATION IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING Mara Dolores Castrillo, Elena Martn-Monje and Elena Brcena49STUDENT PREFERENCES FOR M-LEARNING APPLICATION CHARACTERISTICS mer Delialio lu & Yasaman Alioon 59viLEARNING AND TEACHING WITH MOBILE DEVICES AN APPROACH IN SECONDARY EDUCATION IN GHANA Margarete Grimus and Martin Ebner66CROSS-CULTURAL DESIGN OF MOBILE MATHEMATICS LEARNING SERVICE FOR SOUTH AFRICAN SCHOOLS Tanja Walsh, Teija Vainio and Jari Varsaluoma75MOBILE LEARNING AND ACHIEVEMENT GOAL ORIENTATION PROFILES Minna Asplund85A REVIEW OF INTEGRATING MOBILE PHONES FOR LANGUAGE LEARNINGRamiza Darmi and Peter Albion93OVERLAPPING CHATS ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS BETWEEN STUDENTS WITH AND WITHOUT DISABILITIES DUE TO THE MOBILE LIMITATIONSRoco Calvo, Ana Iglesias and Lourdes Moreno101UML Quiz: AUTOMATIC CONVERSION OF WEB-BASED E-LEARNING CONTENT IN MOBILE APPLICATIONS Alexander von Franqu and Hilda Tellio lu109PEDAGOGICAL APPLICATIONS OF SMARTPHONE INTEGRATION IN TEACHING - LECTURERS', STUDENTS' & PUPILS' PERSPECTIVES Tami Seifert117MOOC TO GO Jan Renz, Thomas Staubitz and Christoph Meinel125STRATEGIES AND CHALLENGES IN IPAD INITIATIVE Chientzu Candace Chou, Lanise Block and Renee Jesness133BLENDING CLASSROOM TEACHING AND LEARNING WITH QR CODES Jenni Rikala and Marja Kankaanranta141PROGRAMMING EDUCATION WITH A BLOCKS-BASED VISUAL LANGUAGE FOR MOBILE APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT Can Mihci and Nesrin Ozdener149SHIFTING CONTEXTS: INVESTIGATING THE ROLE OF CONTEXT IN THE USE OF UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING FOR DESIGN-BASED LEARNINGKatharine S. Willis and Gianni Corino157EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR DEPENDABLE MOBILE LEARNING SCENARIOS Manel Bensassi and Mona Laroussi 167INITIAL EVALUATION OF A MOBILE SCAFFOLDING APPLICATION THAT SEEKS TO SUPPORT NOVICE LEARNERS OF PROGRAMMING Chao Mbogo, Edwin Blake and Hussein Suleman175DEFINING A SET OF ARCHITECTURAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SERVICE-ORIENTED MOBILE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS Nemsio Freitas Duarte Filho and Ellen Francine Barbosa 183viiPORTABILITY AND USABILITY OF OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES ON MOBILE DEVICES: A STUDY IN THE CONTEXT OF BRAZILIAN EDUCATIONAL PORTALS AND ANDROID-BASED DEVICES Andr Constantino da Silva, Fernanda Maria Pereira Freire, Vitor Hugo Miranda Mouro, Mrcio Digenes de Oliveira da Cruz and Helosa Vieira da Rocha191EVALUATING QR CODE CASE STUDIES USING A MOBILE LEARNING FRAMEWORK Jenni Rikala199DEVELOPING A MOBILE SOCIAL MEDIA FRAMEWORK FOR CREATIVE PEDAGOGIES Thomas Cochrane, Laurent Antonczak, Matthew Guinibert and Danni Mulrennan207FACTORS AFFECTING M-LEARNERSCOURSE SATISFACTION AND LEARNING PERSISTENCE Young Ju Joo, Sunyoung Joung, Eugene Lim and Hae Jin Kim215A FRAMEWORK TO SUPPORT MOBILE LEARNING IN MULTILINGUAL ENVIRONMENTS Mmaki E. Jantjies and Mike Joy222SHORT PAPERS MOBILE TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATED PEDAGOGICAL MODEL Arshia Khan233REPRESENTATIONS OF AN INCIDENTAL LEARNING FRAMEWORK TO SUPPORT MOBILE LEARNING Eileen Scanlon, Mark Gaved, Ann Jones, Agnes Kukulska-Hulme, Lucas Paletta and Ian Dunwell238USING MOBILE APPS AND SOCIAL MEDIA FOR ONLINE LEARNER-GENERATED CONTENT Paul David Henry243TWEETING AS A TOOL FOR LEARNING SCIENCE: THE CREDIBILITY OF STUDENT-PRODUCED KNOWLEDGE CONTENT IN EDUCATIONAL CONTEXTS Kaja Vembe Swensen, Kenneth Silseth and Ingeborg Krange247WHAT MOBILE LEARNING AND WORKING REMOTELY CAN LEARN FROM EACH OTHER Koen Depryck252IN-TIME ON-PLACE LEARNING Merja Bauters, Jukka Purma and Teemu Leinonen256M-LEARNING AND TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY: ANALYZING BENEFITS FOR APPRENTICESHIP Carlos Manuel Pacheco Corts and Adriana Margarita Pacheco Corts 261viiiDESIGNING A SITE TO EMBED AND TO INTERACT WITH WOLFRAM ALPHA WIDGETS IN MATH AND SCIENCES COURSES Francisco Javier Delgado Cepeda and Ruben Dario Santiago Acosta 266AN ENVIRONMENT FOR MOBILE EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING Otto Petrovic, Philipp Babcicky and Philipp Babcicky271SUPPORTING SITUATED LEARNING BASED ON QR CODES WITH ETIQUETAR APP: A PILOT STUDY Miguel Olmedo Camacho, Mar Prez-Sanagustn, Carlos Alario-Hoyos, Xavier Soldani, Carlos Delgado Kloos and Sergio Sayago277RAISING AWARENESS OF CYBERCRIME - THE USE OF EDUCATION AS A MEANS OF PREVENTION AND PROTECTION Julija Lapuh Bele, Maja Dimc, David Rozman and Andreja Sladoje Jemec281MOBILE GAME FOR LEARNING BACTERIOLOGY Ryo Sugimura, Sotaro Kawazu, Hiroki Tamari, Kodai Watanabe, Yohei Nishimura, Toshiki Oguma, Katsushiro Watanabe, Kosuke Kaneko, Yoshihiro Okada, Motofumi Yoshida, Shigeru Takano and Hitoshi Inoue285THE THEORY PAPER: WHAT IS THE FUTURE OF MOBILE LEARNING? John Traxler and Marguerite Koole289RAPID PROTOTYPING OF MOBILE LEARNING GAMES Maija Federley, Timo Sorsa, Janne Paavilainen, Kimo Boissonnier and Anu Seisto294PREPARING LESSONS, EXERCISES AND TESTS FOR M-LEARNING OF IT FUNDAMENTALS S. Djenic, V. Vasiljevic, J. Mitic, V. Petkovic and A. Miletic299THE MOTIVATING POWER OF SOCIAL OBLIGATION: AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE PEDAGOGICAL AFFORDANCES OF MOBILE LEARNING INTEGRATED WITH FACEBOOK Nurhasmiza Sazalli, Rupert Wegerif and Judith Kleine-Staarman303WHEN EVERYONE IS A PROBE, EVERYONE IS A LEARNER Boris Berenfeld, Tatiana Krupa, Arseny Lebedev and Sergey Stafeev308MOBILE LEARNING AND ART MUSEUMS: A CASE STUDY OF A NEW ART INTERPRETATION APPROACH FOR VISITOR ENGAGEMENT THROUGH MOBILE MEDIA Victoria Lpez Benito313LEARNER CENTRIC IN M-LEARNING: INTEGRATION OF SECURITY, DEPENDABILITY AND TRUST Sheila Mahalingam, Faizal Mohd Abdollah and Shahrin Sahib318M-LEARNING PILOT AT SOFIA UNIVERSITY Elissaveta Gourova, Pavlin Dulev, Dessislava Petrova-Antonova and Boyan Bontchev323A MOBILE SERVICE ORIENTED MULTIPLE OBJECT TRACKING AUGMENTED REALITY ARCHITECTURE FOR EDUCATION AND LEARNING EXPERIENCES Sasithorn Rattanarungrot, Martin White and Paul Newbury327ixREFLECTION PAPERSLEARNERS ENSEMBLE BASED SECURITY CONCEPTUAL MODEL FOR M-LEARNING SYSTEM IN MALAYSIAN HIGHER LEARNING INSTITUTION Sheila Mahalingam, Faizal Mohd Abdollah and Shahrin Sahib335SUPPORTING THE M-LEARNING BASED KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER IN UNIVERSITY EDUCATION AND CORPORATE SECTOR Andrs Benedek and Gyrgy Molnr339POSTERTHE FUTURE OF UBIQUITOUS ELEARNING Timothy Arndt347AUTHOR INDEX xxiFOREWORDThese proceedings contain the papers of the 10th International Conference on Mobile Learning 2014, which was organised by the International Association for Development of the Information Society, in Madrid, Spain, 28 February 2 March, 2014. The Mobile Learning 2014 International Conference seeks to provide a forum for the presentation and discussion of mobile learning research which illustrate developments in the field. In particular, but not exclusively, we aim to explore the theme of mobile learning under the following topics: - Learning analytics and mobile learning - Cloud computing and mobile learning - Pedagogical approaches, models and theories for mLearning - mLearning in and across formal and informal settings - Strategies and challenges for integrating mLearning in broader educational scenarios - User Studies in mLearning - Learner mobility and transitions afforded by mlearning - Socio-cultural context and implications of mLearning - Mobile social media and user generated content - Enabling mLearning technologies, applications and uses - Evaluation and assessment of mLearning - Research methods, ethics and implementation of mLearning - Innovative mLearning approaches - Tools, technologies and platforms for mLearning - mlearning: where to next and how? The Mobile Learning Conference 2014 received 83 submissions from more than 29 countries. Each submission has been anonymously reviewed by an average of 4 independent reviewers, to ensure that accepted submissions were of a high standard. Consequently only 28 full papers were approved which means an acceptance rate of 15%.A few more papers were accepted as short papers, reflection papers and poster. An extended version of the best papers will be published in the International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (ISSN: 1941-8647). The Conference, besides the presentation of full papers, short papers, reflection papers and poster also included a keynote presentation from an internationally distinguished researcher. We would therefore like to express our gratitude to Professor Steve Benford, Professor of Collaborative Computing in the Mixed Reality Laboratory at the University of Nottingham, UK, for accepting our invitation as keynote speaker. In addition, Mobile Learning 2014 features a Panel that is chaired by Nicole M. Kendall, Tennessee State University - Nashville, TN, USA and Robbie K. Melton, Tennessee Board of Regents - Nashville, TN, USA xiiA successful conference requires the effort of many individuals. We would like to thank the members of the Program Committee for their hard work in reviewing and selecting the papers that appear in this book. We are especially grateful to the authors who submitted their papers to this conference and to the presenters who provided the substance of the meeting. We wish to thank all members of our organizing committee. Last but not least, we hope that everybody has enjoyed Madrid and their time with colleagues from all over the world, and we invite you all to next edition of the International Conference on Mobile Learning in 2015. Inmaculada Arnedillo Snchez, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland. Conference Program Chair Pedro Isaas, Universidade Aberta (Portuguese Open University), Portugal Conference Chair Madrid, Spain February 2014 xiFOREWORDThese proceedings contain the papers of the 10th International Conference on Mobile Learning 2014, which was organised by the International Association for Development of the Information Society, in Madrid, Spain, 28 February 2 March, 2014. The Mobile Learning 2014 International Conference seeks to provide a forum for the presentation and discussion of mobile learning research which illustrate developments in the field. In particular, but not exclusively, we aim to explore the theme of mobile learning under the following topics: - Learning analytics and mobile learning - Cloud computing and mobile learning - Pedagogical approaches, models and theories for mLearning - mLearning in and across formal and informal settings - Strategies and challenges for integrating mLearning in broader educational scenarios - User Studies in mLearning - Learner mobility and transitions afforded by mlearning - Socio-cultural context and implications of mLearning - Mobile social media and user generated content - Enabling mLearning technologies, applications and uses - Evaluation and assessment of mLearning - Research methods, ethics and implementation of mLearning - Innovative mLearning approaches - Tools, technologies and platforms for mLearning - mlearning: where to next and how? The Mobile Learning Conference 2014 received 128 submissions from more than 29 countries. Each submission has been anonymously reviewed by an average of 4 independent reviewers, to ensure that accepted submissions were of a high standard. Consequently only 28 full papers were approved which means an acceptance rate of 22%.A few more papers were accepted as short papers, reflection papers and a poster. An extended version of the best papers will be published in the International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (ISSN: 1941-8647). The Conference, besides the presentation of full papers, short papers, reflection papers and a poster also included a keynote presentation from an internationally distinguished researcher. We would therefore like to express our gratitude to Professor Steve Benford, Professor of Collaborative Computing in the Mixed Reality Laboratory at the University of Nottingham, UK, for accepting our invitation as keynote speaker. In addition, Mobile Learning 2014 features a Panel that is chaired by Nicole M. Kendall, Tennessee State University - Nashville, TN, USA and Robbie K. Melton, Tennessee Board of Regents - Nashville, TN, USA xiiA successful conference requires the effort of many individuals. We would like to thank the members of the Program Committee for their hard work in reviewing and selecting the papers that appear in this book. We are especially grateful to the authors who submitted their papers to this conference and to the presenters who provided the substance of the meeting. We wish to thank all members of our organizing committee. Last but not least, we hope that everybody has enjoyed Madrid and their time with colleagues from all over the world, and we invite you all to next edition of the International Conference on Mobile Learning in 2015. Inmaculada Arnedillo Snchez, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland. Conference Program Chair Pedro Isaas, Universidade Aberta (Portuguese Open University), Portugal Conference Chair Madrid, Spain February 2014 xiiiPROGRAM COMMITTEEPROGRAM CHAIRInmaculada Arnedillo Snchez, Trinity College Dublin, IrelandCONFERENCE CHAIRPedro Isaas, Universidade Aberta (Portuguese Open University), Portugal COMMITTEE MEMBERS Abeer Alnuaim, University Of The West Of England Uwe Bristol, United Kingdom Adamantios Koumpis, Altec Software S.A., Greece Agostino Marengo, University Of Bari, Italy Alessandro Caforio, UNINETTUNO University, Italy Alessandro Pagano, University Of Bari, Italy Alessio Barbone, University Of Bari, Italy Alex Voychenko, Irtc, Ukraine Anastasios Economides, University Of Macedonia, Greece Anastasios Karakostas, Aristotle University, Greece Anastopoulou Stamatina, Systems and Products Design, University of the Aeg, Greece Andrea Pozzali, European University of Rome, Italy Andreas P. Schmidt, Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences, Germany Angelos Michalas, TEI of Western Macedonia, Greece Anna Ficarella, La Sapienza University, Italy Anna Riccioni, University Of Bologna, Italy Antoanela Naaji, Vasile Goldis Western University, Romania Antonio Panaggio, Ministry Of Education, Italy Balsam Alsugair, The Open University, United Kingdom Beat Doebeli Honegger, Schwyz University of Teacher Education, Switzerland Boriss F. Misnevs, Transport and Telecommunication Institute, Latvia Bren Taylor, Service Birmingham, United Kingdom Brendan Tangney, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland Carl Smith, London Metropolitan University, United Kingdom Carmen Holotescu, Politehnica University Of Timisoara, Romania Cathleen Norris, University Of North Texas, Usa Charalampos Karagiannidis, University of Thessaly, Greece Charles Jennings, Learning & Performance Consultant, United Kingdom Chengjiu Yin, Kyushu University, Japan Chiara Rossitto, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, DSV, Sweden xiv Chiu-kuo Liang, Chunghua University, Taiwan Christoph Richter, Christian-Albrechts-Universitt zu Kiel, Germany Christos Bouras, University Of Patras, Greece Claire Bradley, Freelance Mlearning / Elearning Consultant, Spain Clark Quinn, Quinnovation, United States Claudia Steinberger, University Of Klagenfurt, Austria Cristina Muntean Hava, National College Of Ireland, Ireland Daniel Churchill, Hong Kong University, Hong Kong David Metcalf, University Of Central Florida, Usa Demetrios Sampson, University Of Pireaus, Greece Dick Davies, Ambient Performance, United Kingdom Dumitru Burdescu, University Of Craiova, Romania Elia Tomadaki, Velti S.A., Greece Elizabeth Fitzgerald, The Open University, United Kingdom Emad Bataineh, Zayed University, United Arab Emirates Erik Duval, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium Euripides Loukis, University Of the Aegean, Greece Fotis Liarokapis, Coventry University, United Kingdom Franz Lehner, University Of Passau, Germany George Magoulas, Birbeck College, United Kingdom Giasemi Vavoula, University Of Leicester, United Kingdom Giuliana Dettori, ITD-CNR, Italy Gwo-Jen Hwang, National Taiwan University Of Science and Technolo, Taiwan Hannu-Matti Jarvinen, Tampere University Of Technology, Finland Harald Kosch, University of Passau, Germany Helen Farley, University Of Southern Queensland, Australia Herman Van Der Merwe, North-West University, South Africa Hsien-sheng Hsiao, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan Inge de Waard, The Open University, United Kingdom Ingo Dahn, University Of Koblenz-landau, Germany Ioannis Anagnostopoulos, University of Thessaly, Greece Ivana Marenzi, University Of Hanover, Germany Jane Sinclair, University Of Warwick, United Kingdom Jekaterina Bule, Riga Technical University, Latvia Jia-sheng Heh, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taiwan Jie-Chi Yang, National Central University, Taiwan Jirarat Sitthiworachart, Walailak University, Thailand Jo Dugstad Wake, InterMedia, Uni Health, Uni Research, Norway Jocelyn Wishart, University Of Bristol, United Kingdom Jorge Couchet, Uned, Spain Jozef Hvorecky, Vysoka Skola Manazmentu, Slovakia Juan Manuel Santos-Gago, University of Vigo, Spain Judith Seipold, London Mobile Learning Group (LMLG), United Kingdom Judy Brown, Advanced Distributed Learning, United States Jun-Ming Su, National University of Tainan, Taiwan xv Kateryna Synytsya, Irtc Its, Ukraine Konstantinos Tarabanis, University Of Macedonia, Greece Kris Isaacson, University Of Minnesota, Usa Kuo-liang Ou, National Hsin-chu University Of Education, Taiwan Lam-for Kwok, City University Of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Larissa Zaitseva, Riga Technical University, Latvia Louise Mifsud, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sc, Norway Luis Anido-rifon, University Of Vigo, Spain Lyn Pemberton, University Of Brighton, United Kingdom Maiga Chang, Athabasca University, Canada Malamati Louta, University of Western Macedonia, Greece Marcus Specht, Open University Of The Netherlands, Netherlands Marguerite Koole, Athabasca University, Canada Maria Helena Braz, Technical University Of Lisbon, Portugal Maria Uther, University of Winchester, United Kingdom Marina Rui, University Of Genova, Italy Mario Vacca, La Sapienza - University Of Rome, Italy Markus Rohde, University Of Siegen, Germany Martin Memmel, German Research Center For Artificial Intelligence, Germany Michael Beigl, Karlsruhe Institute Of Technology (kit), Germany Michele Notari, University of Teacher Education Bern, Switzerland Michelle Pieri, University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy Mike Joy, University Of Warwick, United Kingdom Milan Turcani, Constantine The Philosopher University In Nitra, Slovakia Monica Divitini, Norwegian University Of Science And Technology, Norway Moushir M. El-Bishouty, Athabasca University, Canada Mudasser Wyne, National University, United States Naif Aljohani, University Of Southampton, United Kingdom Nicola Doering, Ilmenau University Of Technology, Germany Nicolaos Protogeros, University Of Macedonia, Greece Nigel Paine, Napier University, United Kingdom Oleksiy Voychenko, International Research And Training Center (irtc), Ukraine Otto Petrovic, University Of Graz, Austria Paul Hayes, National College Of Ireland, Ireland Petra Poulova, University Of Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic Phelim Murnion, Galway-Mayo Institute Of Technology, Ireland Phillip Benachour, Lancaster University, United Kingdom Pramod Pathak, National College Of Ireland, Ireland Qing Tan, Athabasca University, Canada Raffaella Guida, University Of Surrey, United Kingdom Raquel Trillo Lado, University Of Zaragoza, Spain Rebecca Hogue, University Of Ottawa, Canada Roberto Bernazzani, Universita Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Italy Roza Dumbraveanu, State Pedagogical University "i.creanga", Republic Of Moldova Sanaz Fallahkhair, University Of Portsmouth, United Kingdom xvi Sarah Mount, University Of Wolverhampton, United Kingdom Sean Siqueira, Federal University of the State of Rio De Janeiro , Brazil Sergio Ilarri, University Of Zaragoza, Spain Shen Ruimin, Shanghai Jaitong University, China Shenguan Yu, Beijing Normal University, China Stella Lee, University of Hertfordshire, Canada Stephen McNeill, Kennesaw State University, USA Stephen White, The University Of Huddersfield, United Kingdom Surya Bahadur Kathayat, Norwegian University Of Science And Technology, Norway Tamara Powell, Kennesaw State University, USA Teresa Cerratto-pargman, Stockholm University, Sweden Thierry Delot, University Of Valenciennes, France Thrasyvoulos Tsiatsos, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece Tomayess Issa, Curtin University, Perth, Australia Tzung-shi Chen, National University of Tainan, Taiwan Vaggelis Kapoulas, Computer Technology Institute And Press Diophantus, Greece Vjaceslavs Sitikovs, Riga Technical University, Latvia Werner Beuschel, IBAW, Germany Yannis P. Psaromiligkos, Technological Education Institute Of Piraeus, Greece Yuan-kai Wang, Fu Jen University, TaiwanLEARNING AND TEACHING WITH MOBILE DEVICES AN APPROACH IN SECONDARY EDUCATION IN GHANA Margarete Grimus and Martin Ebner Institute for Information Systems Computer Media, Graz University of Technology, Austria ABSTRACT While many developing nations find Internet-based e-learning unsuitable for their needs (lack of technology as well as of accessibility), mobile learning methods specifically those involving the use of mobile-phones for both formal and informal learning hold great promise for them (Grimus et al, 2013b). This article examines the chances and challenges of the use of mobile devices to support improvement and transformation of education in a Senior High School in Ghana. It draws attention to the local situation in a field-study looking at infrastructure, development of material and support. A model for teacher training was designed to facilitate teachers attitudes and abilities for implementation of mobile learning. The article figures out how mobile devices can be integrated in learning and teaching on the specific background of a school in Ghana. Based on our results we conclude that teachers and students want to use mobile devices in learning. Their perceptions are positive and they developed courses for specific subjects available for eReaders and mobile phones. The results and feedback from two workshops encourage us to propose this model as an example for integration of mobile devices for learning in other regions of Sub Sahara Africa. KEYWORDS Mobile devices, didactic potential, content-creation for small screens, collaborative learning. 1. INTRODUCTION Although the education system in Ghana has witnessed various policy reforms with the aim of ensuring universal access to improved quality education for all children it is evident that progress towards the implementation of ICT in education in Ghana has been slow for several reasons, e.g. high cost of information and communication infrastructure, lack of technical expertise (UNESCO 2012, Grimus et al, 2013a) There is growing concern in Africa about the use of computers to support learning, but the general state of pedagogical integration of ICTs in Ghana is low (Yianda, 2010) Computers and mobile technologies are revolutionizing what we know and how we know it, and hence what we learn and how we can learn it we should however be careful not to obscure the nuances and differences between individual devices and technologies and the various ways in which different cultures and societies adopt and adapt them. (Traxler,2010, p.15) Traxler points out that ethics, behavior, fashion and language are expressions of identity, community and nature and the use of mobile devices has therewith an increasing impact with implications for the working of education institutions. (Traxler, 2010, p.9) The general idea of the study is to explore how secondary education in Ghana can benefit from new developments in mobile technologies together with new didactical approaches. (Huber, 2012) A research project was designed to help teachers at Senior High Technical School in Ghana to use ICT for professional development (1st workshop) and to develop content for mobile learning with teachers and students in a follow-up event (2nd workshop). The aim is to provide students a possibility to access learning material on their own mobile phones whenever they demand it and to produce content particular to local demands. Mobile phones use a small screen and are limited as an input medium. This makes structuring content even more important (Huber and Ebner, 2013). Delivering knowledge chunked means that content is structured and connected in very different ways from common lectures and books. (Traxler, 2010, p. 14) The project is designed on small scale, based on the environment and specific needs of the school in Keta. It runs without external funds, but has a strong focus on the practicability in the field. The overall research goal is to develop a model for integration of mobile devices at Keta Senior High Technical School in Ghana,to empower teachers to activate similar adoption in other schools. ISBN: 978-989-8704-02-3 2014 IADIS662. METHODOLOGY Objectives of the research: The study tries to carry out on-site conditions for using mobile technologies for teaching and learning in Ghana. The major research questions are defined as following:1. How can mobile learning strategies be implemented in the field? 2. How can this experiences help for further strategies on learning and teaching in Sub Sahara Africa (SSA) Therefore the study looks in particular to following areas: How can teachers contribute to implement mobile learning? Preconditions and necessities to be addressed to enable mobile learning. Can access to digital content be improved by using mobile phones? Research Methods: The research work was conducted as an on-site field study with qualitative interviews and quantitative questionnaires, carried out during two workshops (September 2012 and 2013) for teacher-training in Keta, Ghana, at Senior High Technical School (KETASCO, http://ketasco.com/). Data collection was executed in two cycles (anonymously). Online-surveys: In September 2012 only teachers from Keta region participated, in September 2013 teachers and students from the school took part. Post-workshop-feedback (surveys after both workshops). 3. RESEARCH STUDY The school is expelled in rankings for a high standard of education, looks back to a long tradition, and is participating in different competitions in the country (e.g. sports, robotics). The campus (boarding school) is situated close to the sea and Keta Lagoon in the south of Ghana, hosting a Junior and a Senior High Technical Secondary School (SHSS) with about 2.800 students and 101 teachers. Each class holds about 40-60 students. Most of the students of SHSS, aged 15-20 years, live at the campus, so do many of the teachers,which provides the chance of informal contact of students and teachers besides school time. From a technical perspective there is one computer-lab (about 15 PCs, WLAN and a projector) with MS Windows as operating system and MS-Office on board. Internet is only available in the computer lab and the bandwidth is low, which causes problems when more persons try to connect to the Internet at the same time; the connection is unstable. 3.1 Research Study 1: Basic ICT-Skills for Teachers- Digital Literacy for 21stCentury The 1st Workshop was scheduled for two weeks at the end of school vacation in September 2012 (10 days, 50 hours). At that time final exams are finished, teachers are available without competing lectures. A government program was put into place just few months ago, where teachers were given laptops for free; the timing fit nicely with the project. Aims of the workshop: The main objective of the workshop was to equip teachers with computer and Internet-skills to integrate digital media in teaching and therewith to support the learning and teaching process. New didactical approaches and methods should be developed, adequate to environment and culture of the region, as well as learning material for this purpose. The workshop addressed the use of digital technology and communication tools in teaching, pedagogical aspects, and to enhance personal skills in digital literacy. The course focused on motivating teachers to explore new methods in using office-tools, e.g. presentations: structuring text, visualization by integration of images, diagrams and tables, to explain facts offered otherwise mainly in textbooks and photocopies, or even only available in one book on the table of the teacher.Topics of the workshop: Pedagogy and didactics: How to enhance teaching and learning by using ICT for preparation and in class teaching. Integration of collaborative learning by using digital devices in subject-teaching. Computer- and Internet-skills to develop learning materials, presentations, assessments. 10th International Conference Mobile Learning 201467 Integration of presentations in class-teaching: layout of worksheets and posters (structure, integration of tables and images), spreadsheets (visualizing data in diagrams). Evaluation of open online resources (OER) Link-lists for self-conducted learning Development of a digital portfolio as an example to recap learning outcomes. Participants: The workshop was designed to take 15 teachers who are encouraged to pass their learned skills on to students and colleagues afterwards. For registration the teachers completed a pre-training survey (basic computer-skills, subject of teaching, expectations of the training). Teachers of KETASCO were addressed as the main target audience, finally few teachers from other schools participated. Two thirds of the teachers used their personal laptops, half of them were the donations of the above mentioned free laptop for teachers project.3.2 Research Study 2: Teach to Learn Learn to Teach. Integration of Mobile Devices to Improve Learning Outcomes The outcome of the first workshop together with the discussions at the ministry of education for further developments in education in Ghana ended up in the decision to continue the project with a follow-up workshop. For the second workshop a better infrastructure was proposed. An extension of the course shouldallow more time for individual projects and practice. The 2nd Workshop was scheduled with duration of three weeks in September 2013, 60 hours course-lessons and additional guided practice: 10 days teacher training, 5days (third week) students and teachers work together; practical issues.The workshop focused on learning and teaching with integration of mobile devices, addressing the development of digital content and guidelines for best practice. Mobile devices affect many aspects of the process by which knowledge, ideas, images, information and hence learning are produced, stored, distributed, delivered and consumed. (Traxler, 2010, p.13) Low cost and affordable mobile phones in Africa are developing a new conduit for learning. Instructional design suitable for desktop computers does not transfer well to mobile phones. (Batchelor, Botha, 2009) To elaborate on a topic a deeper insight may be gained by creation of micro-content, e.g. adjusting material which is available online or in books for local demands,integrating images, figures and graphs. Ethics and cultural aspects gained during the first workshops were considered. Aims of the workshop: Teachers integrate learning with mobile devices at Senior Technical High School to improve learning outcomes. With regard to the didactic and pedagogical potential the creation of digital portfolios, presentations and content-chunks leads to self-directed learning, learning by doing and by experiences. Teachers are encouraged to transfer their new didactic/pedagogic insights to students and colleagues. This can shift teaching methods to more efficiency in knowledge-achievement and learning. Topics of the workshop: Didactical methods: Evaluation of digital learning material e.g. Open Content, OER; Licenses; CreativeCommons; Simple English Wikipedia, etc. and possibilities for integration in teaching. Creation of locally relevant digitized content for subject-teaching; upload of micro-content (epub, pdf) to mobile phones. Integration of collaborative mobile learning methods: Cloud (drop-box) for micro-content development,feedback and reviews. Hands on: Development of a personal digital portfolio; specific tools, e.g. ABC platform for transformation of content into eBooks: https://ebook.tugraz.at/ (Nagler et al., 2012), test of output withmobile phones (NOKIA E5-00) and eReader; peer-review. Guidelines: Best practice mobile devices for learning. Participants: 20 teachers from KETASCO registered for the course (basic computer and MS-Office-skills were requested, a personal laptop appreciated), in the third week additional 13 students participated fulltime, while 5 teachers had left the course. A student of KETASCO assisted in technical and organizational aspects, his support was highly appreciated and contributed to the success of the workshop. ISBN: 978-989-8704-02-3 2014 IADIS684. RESULTS 4.1 General Results Pedagogy: Different methods of pedagogy in class teaching (Ghana / Europe) were figured out. In Ghana methods of teaching are dominantly frontal; memorization of text is common practice. Even in SHSS ICT is only taught in specific ICT-classes, tests in ICT are carried out in paper writing. The results of the online-surveys during the two workshops indicated that mobile technologies and digital devices are rarely used in educational context so far.It can be pointed out that teachers highly appreciated methods of group work and cooperation, which they experienced during the workshops (see feedback of the workshops in 4.2 and 4.3). Peer-review and different modes of interaction were also introduced in the courses. Infrastructure: Frequent power outage impairs the work in the computer-lab (PCs and router). Online Survey: With regard to the online-surveys it has to be mentioned that in September 2012 only teachers participated in the survey, while in 2013 teachers and students were encouraged to participate. Although the numbers are low the percentage is given in addition, to allow easier comparison of the results in the specific groups. In table 1 and table 2 data of ownership and types of different devices are figured out. Table 1. Which of these devices do you own?Teachers 2012 Teachers 2013 Students 2013Ownership n =36 n=18 n=43Mobile phone 31 86% 17 94% 40 93%Computer (desktop or tower) 20 56% 9 50% 13 30%Laptop or Netbook 27 70% 12 67% 15 35%Tablet 5 14% 2 11% 2 5%Digital Camera/Video 14 39% 4 22% 5 12%Other (Kindle, iPod) 2 6% 3 17% 4 9%Table 2. Which type of mobile phone do you have?Teachers 2012 Teachers 2013 Students 2013Type of mobile phone n =31 n=17 n=40Smart-phone 15 48% 8 47% 15 38%Feature-phone 4 13% 2 12% 9 23%Common (basic) mobile phone 12 39% 7 41% 13 33%Dont know 0 0% 0 0% 3 8%As it is seen in table 1 and 2 there is only a slight difference in the data of teachers in year 2012 and 2013. While ownership of mobile phones of teachers and students show nearly similar high rates there is a considerable difference with regard to the ownership of computers and laptops or notebooks. Furthermore it is from interest that only seven teachers (56 in total) do not own a computer or laptop, compared to another ten having at least more than one. In contrast only about one third of the students own a computer, another third a laptop. It is definitely possible for the majority of teachers to develop content with a computer or laptop, while most of the students have access to it when it is available on mobile phones. Mobile devices allow to access content even during power-outages. Table 3 shows teachers and students possibilities of Internet access with mobile phones. Table 3. Do you have Internet access with your mobile phone? Teachers 2012 Teachers 2013 Teachers total Students 2013Availability of Internet-asccess n =31 n=17 n =48 n=40Yes, always 24 77% 11 65% 35 73% 31 77%Yes, but only when Wi-Fi is available 4 13% 2 12% 6 12% 4 10%No, cant access the Internet 3 10% 4 24% 7 15% 5 13%In table 3 a difference to access the Internet with mobile phones can be pointed out only in the small group of teachers in September 2013. This may be due to the small number of the sample, but looking at the total numbers of teachers and students no significant difference can be figured out: 85 % of teachers and 87 % of students can access online content at least when Wi-Fi is available. 10th International Conference Mobile Learning 2014694.2 Research Study Workshop 1 Outcome: The first workshop addressed basic ICT literacy with a focus on pedagogy. Although the participants had answered a pre-questionnaire with regard to ICT skills it turned out that this ranged from difficulties in saving a file to basic skills in video-editing; most common was text-processing and use of Facebook. Few teachers expressed the use of www for preparation of their lessons to some extent. All teachers used mobile phones for phone-calls, although most of them could access mobile Internet only few used it. As a possible reason was figured out that less than a third were familiar with basic Internet skills. It was difficult for them to create a portfolio, to extract keywords from a presentation or to formulate short statements on ICT related topics with own words. Finally 14 teachers fulfilled the requirements (course-attendance, portfolio, worksheets and presentations) and received a certificate for successful completion. The course-feedback was targeted to how the workshop changed teachers views of teaching in classroom practice. They were asked to review on how they have benefited by improving ICT-skills and didactical methods. Unfortunately a virus-attack followed by power-outage did not allow saving the feedbacks on pen-drives, only three of private laptops could be received. Some statements with regard onteaching are given as examples: can offer better guidance to my students and on how to use search engines and ICT tools more effectively, integrate the new skills in subsequent teaching: how to produce better documents in Word, Powerpoint and Excel to meet professional standards and to improve learning outcomes, the use of digital literacy methods in teaching would have positive impact on the cognitive and affective domains of the learners. In a follow-up online survey concerns of teachers perceptions towards future developments for learning with integration of mobile devices were requested. A five-point Likert-Scale is preferred for the reactions of the perception in the research. For each of the statements there is an obligation to be classified with one of the five categories: I strongly agree / I agree / neutral / I do not agree / I strongly disagree. The answers gathered were graded between 1 and 5 points, giving five points to category I strongly agree and one point to the category I strongly disagree. The average gives an overall perception of the item specified.In table 4 teachers perception of having material available on an own mobile device are given, on similar questions for teachers (T) and students (St): Would you agree that having course material available on your mobile device would be beneficial for teaching? (T) ..would be beneficial for the learning process?(St)Table 4. Comparison: Teachers and students perceptions of course material available on mobile devices. I strongly disagree I disagree neutral I agree I strongly agree Answers total Course materialAverageT St T St T St T St T St T St T St 1 0 0 2 1 3 8 14 19 12 29 31 Slides 4.52 4.161 0 0 0 3 2 5 16 19 13 28 31 Lecture Notes 4.46 4.351 1 0 3 3 3 9 11 15 11 28 29 Quizzes 4.32 3.971 0 0 1 2 1 9 16 15 10 27 28 Link-List 4,37 4,251 0 0 1 4 2 8 14 16 13 29 30 eBooks 4.31 4.30The findings can be interpreted that both, teachers perceptions (average 4.4 points) as well as students (average 4.2 points) towards availability of different course material on mobile devices are highly positive.The result shows clearly that banning mobiles at school which is common state cannot be a realistic long-term solution. Challenges: Infrastructure and equipment in the computer-lab did not meet the expected requirements: Frequent power-outages and lack of Internet-connection heavily affected the workshop. This was also the mostly complained issue by the participants. The PCs were not well maintained and full of viruses; due to disconnection of the Internet no updates were possible. Hence the proposed topic Basic Internet-skills and best-practice Internet for learning and teaching could not be performed to the extent as planned: It was not possible to address main topics of the course-curriculum without Internet, thus some of the proposed activities had to be cancelled (evaluation of OER with regard to local demands; upload of micro-content; installation of free software). After the workshop a meeting was held at the Ministry of Education in Accra with a delegate of the ministry, the headmaster and two teachers. The outcome of the workshop was discussed and a continuation of the project was proposed. Support of service and substantial improvements with Internet-connectivity were promised for the follow-up workshop, installation of solar-power and improvement of Wi-Fi-connectivity were discussed. ISBN: 978-989-8704-02-3 2014 IADIS704.3 Research Study Workshop 2 The second workshop focused on preparing teachers to understand how mobile technologies can be incorporated effectively into teaching and support students learning. To overcome the challenges recognized in the first workshop the second workshop was developed to focus on learning and teaching strongly by integration of mobile devices. In the second workshop it was recognized that a lot had changed in teaching after the first workshop: Teachers were more open-minded to new teaching methods.For testing 20 mobile phones (second hand Nokia E5-00 smart-phones, 256k display colours, 10 days standby, Micro-SDHC 2GB included inbox) and 5 eReader (TrekSTor E-Book Reader Pyrus mini, 4,3 Digital Ink) were brought from Europe, together with an additional WLAN router to support mobile Internet access.Outcome: Based on the experience (power-outages) during the first phase of the workshop the need of flexibility in planning lessons was clearly recognized. Teachers were open-minded to learn about benefits and practiced new didactical approaches by using mobile devices. In order to rethink methods of learning and teaching the following thesis was proposed: In five years all textbooks in Ghanaian Senior High Secondary Schools (SHSS) are provided as eBooks. Discuss in groups (2-3 teachers) possible consequences for a) teaching, b) learning, c) schools! The outcome was presented as posters on paper, due to power-outage at the time. Students were introduced by teachers in creating a digital portfolio and use of a drop-box. The importance of development of guidelines by teachers together with students was clearly identified.A final (anonymous) evaluation on three main issues, executed by four external examiners (teachers from other SHSS), approved the success of the course, the quality of the material developed, and gave positive feedback to the participants. Teachers portfolios: Assessment on the quality of reports, structure, achieved learning outcomes, keywords, take-home-statements and summary. Course-units developed by teachers and students (small groups, 1-2 teachers+ 1-2 students); specific topics, available on mobile devices. Assessment of course-structure, -design, appropriate for small screens, patterns of visualization, e.g. images. Guidelines Best Practice-Posters. Assessment checked on completeness. Courses were developed on the topics Classification of Computer Hardware, Adolescence Pregnancy, Atomic Bonds, Adolescence Chastity, Projectiles, Projectiles, English Nouns, Law of Agency, Elements of Design, Demand, SET Theory, just to name some. The screenshots below can give an idea of the eBooks. Image 1 illustrates the structure of a course-unit on the topic Classification of Computer Hardware and shows the associated task. In image 2 the learning objectives of the course-topic Atom Physics are displayed. Image 1. eBook :Classification of Computer Hardware.Image 2. eBook: Basics of Atom Physics. 10th International Conference Mobile Learning 201471The course-feed-back to included 13 items for students and 15 for teachers. It was planned as online-survey, but due to power-outage it was conducted on paper. In table 5 examples of answers to open questions are given. Table 5. Specific issues were questioned, answers of students and teachers.Teachers (n=12) Students (n=13) Comments: Benefits Ten teachers reported new ideas for teaching; appreciate the practical part and activities, teamwork; appreciated working together with students; benefits for learning by integrating what I have learned in the workshop. learnt that I can use my mobile phone for more than just for gaming;realized that I can do much more with my mobile; makes learning easier;can get more information on my own without having to contact my teacher; easier sharing information with friends and teachers; read eBooks. aids my study-plan, getting information quick. Comments: Challengespoor Wi-Fi availability, devices and Internet-connectivity costs; lack of mobile devices and infrastructure ; students are not allowed to bring mobile phones to class.mobile devices at school are not allowed (5 x), disruptive attention in class, rules need to be changed. Individual knowledge of how can mobile devices benefit in teaching and support students learningBefore / after workshop: poor 4/ 0, fair 4/ 0, good 4/ 8, excellent 0/ 4. Before / after workshop: poor 3/ 0, fair 9/ 0, good 1/ 4, excellent 0/ 9.Comments: Like bestpractical aspect, hands on; new methods of learning and teaching;interactive nature of the workshop/ group work.built new student-teacher- relationship; practical aspects; creating own content and presentations.Free commentsprogram should keep running; opened my eyes to new ideas of teaching; enhances teaching; teachers need regularly continued professional development; necessary for 21st century teachers, need more of it.Students expressed high appreciation of co-working with their teachers and creation of content and presentations together.Comments to like least, teachers and students: frequent power outages, Internet disconnectionTeachers were asked about their knowledge of pedagogical and didactical methods to integrate mobile devices in teaching and learning before and after the workshop: Results: poor 2/ 0, fair 6/ 1, good 3/ 6,excellent 1/ 5.In the online survey (September 2013) concerns of teachers and students awareness and perception of learning and teaching with mobile devices were questioned. Two teachers and six students reported the use of free mobile content available on mobile devices, while 13 (72%) teachers and 25(58%) students havent used it, but would like to do so. A similar question as in workshop 1 (Table 4) addressed preferences for different types of material for mobile devices: Do you agree that having course material available on your mobile device would be beneficial for teaching? (teachers, T), .for learning? (students, St). The outcome is similar to the results of the previous year and indicates that all items are highly appreciated (all >4 points,max. 5): Slides are rated with 4.6 points (T) and 4.2 (St); Lecture Notes: 4.6 (T), 4.3 (St); Quizzes: 4.2 (T and St), Link-List: 4.3 (T), 4.2 (St); eBooks: 4.4 (T and St). For details of the evaluation-method see online-survey in workshop 1.The requirements for the final certificate of the workshop included fulltime participation in the workshop, a digital portfolio and course-content on a topic of the curriculum of the subject taught at school, available on a mobile-phone and eBook. Finally 14 certificates were handed over to teachers by the headmaster in the general assembly during the opening ceremony, together with awards for the best three in each category:course-content, portfolio, guidelines for best-practice. Challenges: The most unpleasant experience was the frequent power-outages and the restricted bandwidth (Wi-Fi). It caused timeouts and uncountable restarts, e.g. uploads to the ABC-system (online-system for developing courses and convert them to eBooks). Although mobile Internet was installed the connection did not supply sufficient performance necessary for working in parallel groups (Huber et al., 2008). 5. DISCUSSION While computer-labs and desktop-computers are scarce in schools in developing countries mobile networks, mobile phones and now smart-phones have the potential to question new approaches to learning and teaching (Traxler, 2011). Mobile penetration compensates the lack of infrastructure, which offers the chance to provide on- and off-line content for learning and knowledge-creation, accessible with mobile devices. Infrastructure: In contrast to Europe ownership of a laptop or computer is not common with students in Higher Secondary Schools, while mobile-phones are predominant (chapter 4.1, table 1). Frequent power- ISBN: 978-989-8704-02-3 2014 IADIS72outages challenge learning-activities with computers. Internet in public schools is not usual, and if, it is only accessible in the computer-lab. Low bandwidth challenges teamwork in groups with timeouts in addition to power-outages. To avoid the problems by converting content to eBooks online, offline tools need to be installed. Benefits: Incorporating students to create digital content together with their teachers has shown positive aspects with creative ideas in structuring content in chunks for mobile devices. A drop-box was appreciated and frequently used as a tool for exchange and feedback. It is recommended to download content to inbox-SD Cards; Micro SD Cards in eBooks and smart-phones can hold a lot of content, hence learning material is available on mobile devices anytime. Mobile phones and eReader provide the opportunity to access content with mobile Internet or Wi-Fi in times of power off for a couple of days, while laptops have limitations due to the battery-life. It allows learning in the evenings, when students come together in their classes, without teachers, for individual learning in peer groups. A local mobile network could help with downloads to students devices. Pedagogy: In his publication at the conference on digital future Traxler pointed out that mobile devices will soon support every pedagogic option including the didactic and the discursive, the individual learning and the social. (Traxler, 2010) Frequent power outages require high flexibility - to switch suddenly from online research to tasks without computer/ Internet-access. At the same time it offers chances for more interactivity and group-work, for discussions and alternative tasks, even to get out of a class, take a photo with the mobile phone, relevant for the topic discussed or with respect to the local environment, and present it later to the audience. To engage students in learning together with their teachers was experienced in the second workshop.Together they became familiar with creating digital portfolios and developing content for specific local demands, using a drop-box for cooperation and feedback. The courses created are contextualized and culturally sensitive. Students as well as teachers expressed high appreciation of co-working and inspiring interactions, which led to rethink the common tracks of learning and teaching. Guidelines - Best practice: Schools worldwide have traditionally banned mobile phones in the classroom.According to the findings in the surveys it can be concluded that teachers perceptions of integration of mobile devices for learning are positive. In the workshop they experienced benefits and challenges together with students and developed guidelines for good practice using mobile devices for learning. The second workshop led to a better understanding of the issue than theoretical statements. A similar acceptance was found in the interview with the headmaster. In the opening ceremony of the new term the headmaster reported to all students and teachers about new trends coming up in education. He pointed out that this could help to become more critical thinkers, referred to new didactical methods and benefits by integrating mobile devices in learning and teaching. He proposed a reform of guidelines for use of mobile devices (mobile phones and eBooks) at school. 6. CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK The project in Ghana is on small scale and looks to develop a model for integration of new methods of learning and teaching with mobile devices. It was put in place to receive feedback on achievements and failures. The research provides first findings about teachers perceptions towards activities using mobile devices in Ghana. Infrastructure and organizational aspects, chances and challenges were experienced in real environment. Main issues of the research were infrastructure, topics and content of workshops on teachersprofessional development as a starting point for changes in education for the 21st century, where mobile devices play an important role in daily life and influence rethinking of methods and didactics of teaching. Content copied at school to Micro SD Cards integrated in mobile devices can help to avoid high costs for data access with mobile Internet. Although mobile Internet is slow and has low bandwidth mobile devices can be used to access content in clouds and during power outage. We can conclude that teachers and students want to use mobile devices for learning. The perceptions are positive. Digital skills as well as didactical methods, necessary for developing content, were addressed, and as reported in the feedback, it can be resumed that the strategies were successful. The results can help to improve delivery of teacher- training and implementation of similar strategies in other schools in the region.Teachers are highly motivated to continue and build up a trainee group at school. At the time of writing a 10th International Conference Mobile Learning 201473group of students has started with development of micro-content for mobile devices. They are tutored by the assistant, who supported the 2nd workshop and who is in close online contact with the course-leader. Together we will try to close the gap between the course in 2013 and the follow-up course in 2014. The experiences from two workshops encourage us to propose this model as an example for integration in other regions of Sub Sahara Africa with similar environment and infrastructure, and where similar challenges can be determined. Teamwork with students offered new insights as well for teachers as for students and can be recognized as a basis for further developments in teaching and learning. We hope that the expertise gained in the workshops will affect further developments. To assure the continuation in the developments a further workshop is planned for 2014.It can be resumed that teachers are starting to take advantage of the opportunities of mobile phones for learning. In summary it takes time for fundamental changes and developing new insights to change traditional ways of teaching and learning towards learning with mobile devices, but it has already started. REFERENCES Batchelor, J.,Botha, A. 2009. Design criteria for mobile phones: a teenagers perspective. mLife Conference and Exhibitions, Barcelona, Spain, 2-4 September 2009, pp 1-10. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/3967 Grimus, M., Ebner, M. 2013b. M-Learning in Sub Saharan Africa Context- What is it about. In . Jan Herrington et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2013.pp. 2028-2033. Chesapeake, VA: AACE. http://www.editlib.org/p/112251.Grimus, M., Ebner, M., Holzinger, A. 2013a. Mobile Learning as a chance to enhance education in developing countries in the example of Ghana. In: mLearn 2012 Conference Proceedings. Specht, M., Sharples, M., Multisittla, J. (eds.).Helsinki, Finland, pp. 340-345, ISSN 1613-073, Volume 955. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-955/. Huber, S. 2012. iPads in the Classroom, Masterthesis at Graz University of Technology, Book on Demand GmbH., Norderstedt, Germany. Huber, S., Ebner, M. 2013. iPad Human Interface Guidelines for M-Learning. In Z.L. Berge and L.Y. Muilenburg (eds.), Handbook of mobile learning. pp. 318-328. New York: Routledge. Huber, T., Nagler, W., Ebner, M. 2008. The ABC-eBook System: From Content Management Application to Mash-up Landscape; Proceeding of the 20th World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (ED-Media), 2008, pp.6015-6022.Nagler, W., Wiesenhofer, K., Ebner et al. 2012. E-Books and E-Reader Devices for E-Learning in Higher Education: The Case of Graz University of Technology. In: E-Books and E-Readers for E-Learning, University of Wellington, New Zealand, pp. 1 24.Traxler, J. 2010. The learner experience of mobiles, mobility and connectedness, Background paper to presentation ELESIG Symposium: Digital Futures, 21 Jan iLab, Innovation Works, University of Reading, UK. http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloud/view/3472. Traxler, J. 2011. Potential of Learning with Mobiles in Africa. Conference Report. In: WISE 2011. World Innovation Summit for Education 2011. http://www.wise-qatar.org/content/prof-john-traxler-potential-learning-mobiles-africa UNESCO 2012. School and Teaching resources in Sub-Saharan Africa. Analysis of the 2011 UIS Regional Data Collection on Education, April 2012. www.uis.unesco.org/Education/Documents/ib9-regional-education-africa-2012-en-v5.pdf Yianda, I. 2010. ICT in Education research across Africa: Presentation at the GeSCI-PanAf Workshop on Research in ICT Education & Development e-Learning Africa, 26th May 2010, International Conference Centre, Lusaka, Zambia. All Internet-resources last retrieved at Dec. 9th, 2013 ISBN: 978-989-8704-02-3 2014 IADIS74

Recommended

View more >