04 Measuring Sustainability and Sustainable Livelihoods

  • Published on
    12-Nov-2014

  • View
    567

  • Download
    0

DESCRIPTION

sustainable livelihood options ppt given by Prof. P.K.Singh ,Institute of Rural Management, Irma.

Transcript

Measuring Sustainability and Sustainable Livelihoods1Birds Eye ViewUnderstanding Sustainable DevelopmentExisting Indicators of DevelopmentMeasuring SDGenerationalisation & Problems2Development GoalsHuman Development indicators related to health, education and income Equity - trends of economic inequality is increasing Human rights - exercise of civil liberty and human rights by all Empowerment - marginalized (SC / ST / women / minorities/ persons with disability) Sustainability- rights of future generations as against present generation, multi-dimensional conceptSustainable Development (SD)Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.- (The Brundtland Commission on Environment and Development: 1987)Improving the quality of human life while living within the carrying capacity of the supporting mechanisms- (The IUCN / UNEP/ WWF definilion: 1991)Sustainable Development (SD)SD debate - Brundtland - in terms of rights of present vs future generations.However, it necessarily involves all three issues:Rights of future generations as against present generation Rights of the poor in the present generation as against those of the rich. Rights of non-humans as against humansGoals of Sustainable DevelopmentWhat is to be sustained Nature Earth Biodiversity Ecosystems What is to be developed People Child survival Life expectancy Education Equity Equal opportunity Economy Wealth Productive sectors Consumption Society Institutions Social capital States Regions6Life support Ecosystem services Resources Environment Community Cultures Groups PlacesSustainable Development (SD)SD is three dimensional concept:Ecological security Economic efficiency Social equityTechnology as fourth dimensionExisting Indicators of Sustainable DevelopmentGDP PQLI NPP EF EStI LPI EPI EVI MSY PSR CCCPQLIGross Domestic Product Physical Quality of Life Index Net Primary Productivity Ecological Footprint Environmental Sustainability Index Living Planet Index Environmental Performance Index Environmental Vulnerability Index Maximum Sustainable Yield Pressure-State-Response model Concept of carrying capacityEconomicsGDPNPP EF EStI LPI EPI EVI CCC MSY PSREDP GSIHDISLSI ISEW CDI SNBIHDIRMS SMS WI GSI EDPHuman Development IndexRelative Measure of Sustainability Safe Minimum Standard Well Being Index Genuine Savings Index Environmental Adjusted Domestic ProductRMS SMS WIEquityEcologyCDI ISEW SNBI SLSICity Development Index Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare Sustainable Net Benefit Index Sustainable Livelihood Security Index8Component VariablesEcological security represented by variables forest cover, land degradation status, soil and water quality parameters, air quality parameters, groundwater depletion, etc.Economic efficiency represented by variables land productivity, labour productivity, marketable surplus, inputoutput ratio, etc.Social equity represented by variables distributionof land, asset and income, people below poverty line, female literacy, MMR, IMR etc.9Variables for Measuring Ecological SecurityLand degradation statusGullied and ravinous land Land affected by Salinity/ alkalinity Shifting cultivation areas Mining / industrial wastelandSoil quality parametersPesticide residues in soilsWater quality parametersNitrate Fluride TDS Toxic substances Heavy metalsGround Water Depletion statusOver-exploited (if net draft > 100% of utilizable recharge) Dark or critical (if net draft is 85% to 100% of utilizable recharge) Grey or semi-critical (if net draft is 65% to 85% of utilizable recharge) White or safe (if net draft < 65% of utilizable recharge)10Sustainable Livelihood Security (SLS)RLS - capability, equity, and sustainability - Chambers and ConwaySLS - livelihood options that are ecologically secure, economically efficient, and socially equitable- Swaminathan11Preconditions for Measuring SLSIIt should be simple, flexible, and information-efficient Given the dynamic nature of SD, it needs to be relative rather than absolute The index needs to be composite so as to take stock not only of the conflicts between the three aspects of sustainability but also of the intrinsic synergy among them It should be easy to construct and understand by policy makers, local-level administrators, and, more importantly, by rural families It should be a tool both for policy making as well as for public education12Measuring SLSITo measure is the first step to improve-Sir William Petty (1623 1687)Steps involved:Identify component variables Get the data Make them comparable Use the formula to construct component indices Find the arithmetic or appropriately weighted mean of the three indices13Formula for Developing SLSIThe relative performance of jth geographical unit in the ith component of the index can be represented as: Xij - min Xij j SLSIij = max Xij - min Xij j j (i = 1,2,..,I) (j = 1,2,.....n)To put simply:SLSI = (X-Min)/(Max-Min)14Measuring SLSI: When Standard is providedSLSI = (X-min)/(standard-min)Minimum should be minimum of the entire data Example: forest cover15SLSI at Agro-climatic Level in IndiaZon e Agro-Climatic Region No. Forest Net Cover Sown (%) Area (%) Land Productivity (Rs/ha) Area Under People Above Female Cereals (%) the Poverty Literacy Line (%) (%)I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII XIII XIV XVWestern Himalayas Eastern Himalayas Lower Gangetic Plain Middle Gangetic Plain Upper Gangetic Plain Trans-Gangetic Plain Eastern Plateau & Hill Plateau & Hill Western Plateau & Hill Southern Plateau & Hill East Coast Plain & Hill West Coast Plain & Ghat Gujarat Plain & Hill Western Dry Island45.30 42.80 11.00 8.70 4.50 3.20 35.20 14,20 11.80 17.10 18.70 29.00 10.90 1.20 88.1018.20 18.70 63.80 62.80 70.10 80.90 35.90 45.00 59.70 48.40 43.30 37.20 51.40 47.70 4.203516 3411 4743 3043 5125 4672 2528 2089 2202 3388 5480 5453 3013 659 589291.75 91.37 83.07 74.02 77.36 71.74 83.51 65.61 61.40 61.57 74.21 80.39 45.93 65.68 35.8079.60 69.90 61.00 51.00 58.60 82.20 50.20 54.50 58.70 61.80 61.90 75.60 72.10 67.20 71.8023.10 27.20 31.80 12.20 15.10 32.10 15.60 14.20 27.40 32.60 30.30 56.20 32.70 9.60 39.1016Indices of the Variables at Agro-climatic Regions of IndiaZon Agro-Climatic Region e No. I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII XIII XIV XV Western Himalayas Eastern Himalayas Lower Gangetic Plain Middle Gangetic Plain Upper Gangetic Plain Trans-Gangetic Plain Eastern Plateau & Hill Plateau & Hill Western Plateau & Hill Southern Plateau & Hill East Coast Plain & Hill West Coast Plain & Ghat Gujarat Plain & Hill Western Dry Island Ecological Indices Forest Cover 0.67 0.64 0.52 0.40 0.18 0.11 1.00 0.40 0.33 0.50 0.55 0.87 0.30 0.00 1.00 Economic Indices Equity Indices Poverty Variable 0.92 0.62 0.34 0.02 0.26 1.00 0.00 0.13 0.27 0.36 0.37 0.79 0.68 0.53 0.67 Female Literacy 0.29 0.38 0.48 0.06 0.12 0.48 0.13 0.10 0.38 0.49 0.44 1.00 0.50 0.00 0.63Cereal Area Net Sown Land Area Productivity 0.18 0.19 0.78 0.76 0.86 1.00 0.41 0.53 0.72 0.58 0.51 0.43 0.62 0.57 0.00 0.55 0.53 0.78 0.46 0.85 0.77 0.36 0.27 0.29 0.52 0.92 0.92 0.45 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.84 0.68 0.74 0.64 0.85 0.53 0.46 0.46 0.69 0.80 0.18 0.53 0.0017Ranking the Agro-climatic Regions by SLSIZone No. Agro-Climatic Region Ecological Security Index 0.428 0.413 0.649 0.581 0.517 0.553 0.707 0.468 0.527 0.536 0.527 0.648 0.459 0.284 0.500 Ranks 13 14 2 4 9 5 1 11 8 6 7 3 12 15 10 Economic Efficiency Index 0.773 0.760 0.813 0.569 0.798 0.705 0.605 0.403 0.376 0.491 0.804 0.857 0.315 0.267 0.500 Ranks 5 6 2 9 4 7 8 12 13 11 3 1 14 15 10 Social Equity Index 0.604 0.497 0.407 0.040 0.190 0.741 0.064 0.117 0.324 0.428 0.405 0.897 0.590 0.266 0.654 Sustainable Livelihood Security Ranks Index Ranks 4 0.602 4 6 0.556 6 8 0.623 3 15 0.397 13 12 0.502 8 2 0.666 2 14 0.459 10 13 0.329 14 10 0.409 12 7 0.485 9 9 0.579 5 1 0.801 1 5 0.455 11 11 0.272 15 3 0.551 7I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII XIII XIV XVWestern Himalayas Eastern Himalayas Lower Gangetic Plain Middle Gangetic Plain Upper Gangetic Plain Trans-Gangetic Plain Eastern Plateau & Hill Plateau & Hill Western Plateau & Hill Southern Plateau & Hill East Coast Plain & Hill West Coast Plain & Ghat Gujarat Plain & Hill Western Dry Region Islands18Dealing with the Values of Opposite QualityReversing the variable Or Using different Formula For example If SLSI = (X-Min)/(Max-Min) Then for opposite variablesSLSI = (Max-X)/(Max-Min)19SLSI at District Level in GujaratBased on ecological as well as socio-economic status, and the availability of district-wise data, we have selected the following indicators for the construction of SLSI:Ecological security indicators: forest cover, water quality unaffected habitations (i.e. habitations that are not affected by pollutants such as fluorides, nitrates, and brackishness), and groundwater recharge potential; Economic efficiency indicators: total food grain yield, milk yield, and net sown area;Social equity indicators: percentage of population above poverty line, female literacy, maternal survival rate, per capita food grain production, and per capita milk production.20Data Used for the Calculation of SLSI in GujaratEcological Security IndicatorsDistrict Forest cover (%) 2 3.2 1.9 8.7 5.3 2.9 16 80.4 6.8 2.6 19.4 2.6 5 2.8 39 14.2 12.9 3 4.9 1.3 10.8 17.7 1.6 8.1 32.9 Water quality unaffecte d habitation s (%) 64 67 68 62 76 68 76 100 51 62 57 79 60 52 91 96 57 38 21 27 67 90 52 73 98Economic Efficiency IndicatorsMilk yield (kg/day) 2.3 2.8 2.8 3.1 2.5 2.6 1.3 0.4 2.9 2.7 2.8 2.4 2.3 4.1 1.7 3.3 1.9 3.4 3.4 3 2.8 3 2.5 2.1 2.7 Net sown area (%) 62.6 73.3 60.7 68 50.1 55.8 18.9 15.9 73.7 42.7 59.7 71.1 9.9 79.3 40.3 66.9 52.3 66.6 50.2 66.4 59.7 55.4 65.7 67.5 53.1 APL population (%) 99 93 94 95 92 97 79 88 94 94 96 95 95 98 86 94 87 96 97 97 89 95 95 95 79Social Security IndicatorsFood grain production per capita of rural population (kg/yr) 370 105 266 170 101 83 197 303 181 102 228 320 124 126 115 130 125 117 148 119 165 126 137 130 106 Milk production per capita of rural population (kg/yr) 216 202 235 269 121 194 127 18 240 207 193 160 306 434 97 151 149 341 373 228 308 186 194 146 106Total food Recharge grain potential yield (%) (kg/ha) 94 150 184 86 179 159 165 493 55 173 142 112 152 67 318 215 171 75 118 143 121 276 157 148 233 1,769 1,665 1,911 1,093 852 1,665 950 1,341 2,190 1,480 2,939 1,961 717 1,592 1,072 2,002 860 989 1,916 1,991 1,256 1,499 1,322 1,075 1,530Female literacy rate 42 42 40 33 42 40 40 34 41 41 41 40 38 41 38 44 36 37 42 43 38 40 38 41 41Maternal survival rate 919 941 801 914 803 926 802 905 908 925 954 835 933 915 898 947 999 884 897 955 964 992 950 866 999Ahmedabad Amreli Anand Banaskantha Bharuch Bhavnagar Dahod Dangs Gandhinagar Jamnagar Junagadh Kaira Kutch Mahesana Narmada Navsari Panchmahals Patan Porbandar Rajkot Sabarkantha Surat Surendranagar Vadodara Valsad21Generalization of the SLSI MethodologyHouseholds in a village Villages in a taluka or district Districts in a state States in a countryAgro-climatic region in a planning contextProject units in a project Resource/ecosystem level for intergenerational analysis Countries at global level23SLSI at Household Level in a VillageEcological dimension may be fixed if ecological endowment of the village under evaluation forms the common basis for the livelihoods of all householdsEconomic DimensionIncome status, Asset ownership status, Food and nutritional status etc.Social DimensionEducational status, Health status, Access to common property etc.24Candidate Variables for Representing the Three components of the SLSI at the Global LevelEnvironnent DimensionNet Deforestation (Deforestation minus Reforestation)Economic DimensionPer Capita GDPSocial/ Human DimensionPer Capita Calorie Available as a Percentage of Need Female LiteracyFavorable water budget of Energy Requirements usable water Per Unit of Output Per Capita Co2 Industrial Emission Yield Per Hectare of food cropsCrop Land Per Capita25Problems in the Construction of SLSIWhile the SLSI methodology is simple and conceptually sound, it faces the same problems often encountered in the construction of any composite indexThe choice of the component variables Identification of appropriate weights for its different componentsWithin the data constraints, the variable choice becomes more of an art than a scienceNaturally, the SLSI constructed by two individuals with differential preferences will not be the same26

Recommended

View more >